Graves On SOHO VoIP

End User Perspective On IP Telephony In The Home Office
  • rss
  • Home
  • About
    • Contact
    • Disclosure
  • Guides & How-To’s
  • Product Reviews
  • Raves
  • Personal Blog

Mythbusting HD Voice: Frequency Response vs Data Rate

mjgraves | May 27, 2009

snom 820 links hoch perspektive 200px Mythbusting HD Voice: Frequency Response vs Data RateOne common misconception that keeps coming up is the assertion that the higher quality audio available through the use of wideband telephony (aka HDVoice) requires more bandwidth on the network. This is simply not true.

The terminology gets confusing for some folks. On the one hand we’re talking about frequency response of the audio channel being much greater, 50 Hz to >7 KHz for most wideband codecs, as compared to 300 Hz to 3.4KHz for the reference standard G.711. All that extra information has to go somewhere, right?

Essentially all of the codecs deployed on the PSTN are quite old. Some like G.711 are, in technology terms, extremely old. At the time of their design the world of technology was very different. CPU and DSP chips offered much less processing power so they could not undertake the complex compression schemes found in more current codecs.

Consider G.729, the PSTN reference standard reduced bitrate codec. G.729 is itself quite vintage. I once had a SIP phone that could handle several G.711 calls at the same time, but only one G.729 encoded call. Why? The DSP inside the device simply didn’t have the power to encode & decode multiple call streams at once. In that case the phone only supported three-way conferencing when all the calls were G.711.

Leap ahead a few years to today. Even the relatively old G.722 codec only requires 64 kbps before packet overhead. G.722 was introduced in the 1980’s at about the time that ISDN was being touted as “the next big thing” so it had to fit into the same 64k B-channel as a normal analog call. That’s exactly the same data rate as G.711, yet with a 16 KHz sample rate it conveys  the full 50Hz – 7Khz frequency response.

More modern codecs & processor technology allow for higher compression rates without incurring additional processing latency. So extended frequency response does not necessarily mean increased data rate. If you look at the following table of codecs you’ll see that only two of the current crop actually exceed the data rate of the plain old G.711.

The codecs are indicated as narrowband or wideband by color code.

AMR 4.75 – 12.2 kbps
AMR-WB (aka G.722.2) 6.6 – 23.85 kbps
AMR-WB+ 5.2 – 48 kbps
G.711 64 kbps
G.711.1 64 – 96 kbps
G.719 32 – 128 kbps
G.722 48 – 64 kbps
G.722.1 24 – 32 kbps
G.722.1 Annex C 32 kbps
G.726 16 – 40 kbps
G.729 8 kbps
G.729.1 8 – 32 kbps

Some of the concern about codec selection and bandwidth use revolves around the fact that some ISPs are imposing monthly transfer caps, and charging their customers for overages. Given that reality consider the following:

  • G.722 or G.711 = 64 kbps before IP overhead, or about 80 kbps with IP overhead.
  • 80 kbps = 10 kB/s
  • 10 kB/s = 600 kB/minute
  • 600 kB/minute = 3,600 kB/hour = 3.6 MB/hour
  • 3,600 kB/hour = 864,000 kB/day = 864 MB/day
  • 864 MB/day = 25.92 GB/mo, presuming a 30 day month

It seems unlikely that typical user (ie not a call center) would crest their ISPs transfer cap based largely on the VoIP calling habit.

Categories
VoIP
Tags
codecs, hdvoice, network, VoIP, wideband
Comments rss
Comments rss
Trackback
Trackback

« Magic Jack: Secrets Of Success? Wideband Telephony On Mobile Phones »

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Search Me?

My Tweets

  • It's a bad habit that I have, revisiting blog posts to make minor edits for days after they go live. #fb
  • @voipusers "all the salty margarita's in Los Angeles, I am gonna drink em up." Well, it's the correct sentiment..if not city.
  • @MikeFedyk @DaveKnell Sorry, accidentally posted a draft, then recalled it. Need some well informed comment before I pull the trigger.
  • Considering Our SILKen Future: Much is being made of the recent events in the IETF Wideband Codec Working Group. ... http://bit.ly/blMto7
  • Set yer SIP phones on stun, we're heading for a major NAT traversal! #fb

Recent Posts

  • Making Use of Wideband Voice Right Now!: IdeaSIP
  • The Inventor Of The Cell Phone Interviewed On C-SPAN
  • OpenPeak Tablet At Mobile World Congress
  • Android In Desktop Phones From MSI
  • Point-CounterPoint: Hosted Voice vs. CPE

Recent Comments

  • Greg on Making Use of Wideband Voice Right Now!: IdeaSIP
  • mjgraves on Making Use of Wideband Voice Right Now!: IdeaSIP
  • Greg on Making Use of Wideband Voice Right Now!: IdeaSIP
  • Ottone on Initial Impressions: Konftel 300 Speakerphone
  • qwe on Gigaset News: New Beta Firmware Release

Series: Making Use of HDVoice Right Now!

  • Series Introduction
  • HDVoice Using Skype
  • HDVoice Using Gizmo5
  • HDVoice Using SIPGate
  • HDVoice Using OnSIP

Make a difference.


Change a life.

VoIP Users Conference

Think About It

RSS From My Personal Blog

  • Mossberg & Jobs On The iPad
  • The Who’s Baba O’Reilly Performed On Gear From ThinkGeek
  • What’s in a name or a title?
  • We Now Have Vacancy
  • Just A Thought

RSS mgraves' shared items in Google Reader

  • Sprint Nextel Loses VoIP Outsourcing Contact with Time Warner Cable
  • Huawei announces SmaKit S7 Android tablet
  • FCC Commissioner rips ISPs on broadband prices, competition
  • TiVo will be offered by Virgin Media in UK later this year
  • Inventor Of Cell Phone (Marty Cooper) Ditched iPhone For Droid
  • Hey Mark Benioff, Facebook and Twitter are free!

Tags

Asterisk Astlinux astricon Audio blog Broadband cell cellular codec conference cordless DECT digium DSL FWD G.722 gateway Gigaset gsm HD hdvoice headset hp M3 music onsip phone polycom QoS router siemens sip skype SNOM soft phone Squeezebox technology uri USB Video VoIP VUC wideband wifi zipdx

Archives

  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org
rss Comments rss valid xhtml 1.1