Graves On SOHO VoIP

End User Perspective On IP Telephony In The Home Office
  • rss
  • Home
  • About
    • Contact
    • Disclosure
  • Guides & How-To’s
  • Product Reviews
  • Raves
  • Personal Blog

VoIP Supply’s New Business Class IAX2 Hard Phone

mjgraves | April 28, 2009

Just a few days ago VoIP Supply announced a new desk phone that’s capable of both SIP and IAX2. Not much has been forthcoming in the way of IAX2 capable end-points, even though the protocol has wound its way through a lengthy standards process. Digium has dropped the little IAXy (aka S101i)  ATA device a while back. Last year Zeeek tried the Allnet 7960 which is IAX2 capable but lacking in some ways. So it seems that to date there just haven’t been any truly business class IAX2 phones to be had.

3 phones 480 VoIP Supplys New Business Class IAX2 Hard Phone

Perhaps this new phone from Citel may change this situation. It certainly has the look of something that we’ve seen before in enterprise telephony. That is, it looks like the sibling of a prior generation of Nortel IP phone. It’s the middle device in the trio shown above (click for larger image) , between a Nortel IP 2001 (left)  and a Nortel IP 2002 (right.) Notice the family resemblance?

Citel has a long history in enterprise telephony, offering their Portico™ devices that perform protocol translation allowing legacy proprietary phones to be deployed in standards-based installations. This new phone appears to be designated their model C4110, which according to the product specification is purely SIP capable. Adding IAX2 capability could be accomplished in a firmware revision.

Update: Wondering why use IAX2 vs SIP? The VoIP Wiki has a nice comparson and VoIP Supply is running a related contest collecting comments on their blog.

Categories
Asterisk, VoIP
Tags
Asterisk, citel, iax2, ip, nortel, phone, sip, voip supply
Comments rss
Comments rss
Trackback
Trackback

« Bargain Alert: Clear One Chat 50 USB Speakerphone The Day The Electrons Stood Still »

9 Responses to “VoIP Supply’s New Business Class IAX2 Hard Phone”

  1. 1
    dave michels says:
    April 28, 2009 at 4:48 pm

    What are the plus/minus of SIP v IAX2?

    Reply
  2. 2
    Cory Andrews says:
    April 28, 2009 at 6:54 pm

    Mike – The Citel 4110 supports IAX out of the box. I’ve been running one in the office as a registered SIP extension off Switchvox and a secondary IAX trunk with a service provider. The phone is very Nortel/Aastra-esque for sure.

    Reply
  3. 3
    mjgraves says:
    April 28, 2009 at 8:38 pm

    @Dave,

    In some cases IAX2 has advantages for NAT traversal. IAX2 passes all signaling and media over one connection, requiring only one port through a NAT/router. This is decidedly unlike SIP which uses a specific port for signaling, then a separate ports for each call leg, inbound and outbound. The VoIP wiki has a good overview of why IAX2 was created.

    In trunking applications IAX2 can conserve some bandwidth through reduced overheads. It aggregates multiple calls into a single stream, again over a single port, signaling and media combined. In this role it was primarily used for trunks between Asterisk servers, but could also work where multi-line end points are involved.

    Reply
  4. 4
    mjgraves says:
    April 28, 2009 at 9:04 pm

    @Corey,

    Thanks for confirming the availability of IAX2. With IAX2 implemented in some potentially attractive hardware it’ll be interesting to see if the phone generates some traction. And if so, in what sort of installation.

    Reply
  5. 5
    Chris says:
    May 5, 2009 at 11:42 am

    Although this phone looks like a Nortel, I suspect it is the ATCOM AT-620 phone in a different case (based on a review of the instruction manual). Looking forward to doing some testing when I get one.

    Reply
  6. 6
    Chris says:
    May 14, 2009 at 8:11 am

    Got my C4110 yesterday. Generally impressed with the phone so far. A few little firmware quirks they need to fix like Daylight Savings time not working properly, and ftp provisioning of the config file does not work.

    Reply
    • 6.1
      mjgraves says:
      May 14, 2009 at 8:15 am

      Do you think it’s the ATCOM device as you suspected?

      Reply
  7. 7
    Chris says:
    May 14, 2009 at 9:20 am

    Sure looks like an ATCOM product to me, I am basing this on the web interface for configuration. The look and feel is almost identical to other ATCOM products I have used in the past.

    Reply
  8. 8
    Joan says:
    January 24, 2010 at 4:18 pm

    Made in China Manufactory
    http://www.5111soft.com/productview.php?id=1&pid=27

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Search Me?

My Tweets

  • No public Twitter messages.

Recent Posts

  • A Tale Of Wonky Wifi Part 1: Netgear & Cisco
  • Thinking Outside The Box: SIP Hard Phone + External Speakerphone
  • Review: Yamaha PSG-01s Personal USB Speakerphone
  • Pondering The Plantronics Savi Go…Further, Please.
  • Polycom Display Sizes Compared

Recent Comments

  • qwe on Gigaset Firmware Update Released
  • Jan1973 on Gigaset Firmware Update Released
  • Jan1973 on Gigaset Firmware Update Released
  • Kim Callis on A Tale Of Wonky Wifi Part 1: Netgear & Cisco
  • Ottone on A Tale Of Wonky Wifi Part 1: Netgear & Cisco

Series: Making Use of HDVoice Right Now!

  • Series Introduction
  • HDVoice Using Skype
  • HDVoice Using Gizmo5
  • HDVoice Using SIPGate
  • HDVoice Using OnSIP

Make a difference.


Change a life.

VoIP Users Conference

RSS From My Personal Blog

  • Just A Thought
  • Knowing Your Limits
  • Funny Stuff: Learning To Speak Teabag
  • TV Is An Evil Plot to Control Our Minds
  • Fred Posner On TSA

Say What?

Economics is extremely useful as a form of employment for economists. — John Kenneth Galbraith

Tags

Asterisk Astlinux astricon Audio blog Broadband cell cellular codec conference cordless DECT digium DSL FWD G.722 gateway Gigaset gsm HD hdvoice headset hp ip M3 music onsip phone polycom QoS router siemens sip skype SNOM soft phone Squeezebox technology USB Video VoIP VUC wideband wifi zipdx

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org
rss Comments rss valid xhtml 1.1