Graves on SOHO Technology

End User Perspective On SOHO Technology
  • rss
  • Home
  • About
    • Contact
    • Advertisers
    • Disclosure
  • Guides & How-To’s
  • Product Reviews
  • Best of…
  • Raves

Point-CounterPoint: Hosted Voice vs. CPE

mjgraves | March 8, 2010
This post is part of a Point-CounterPoint open debate with fellow telecom blogger Dave Michels. In this new series, we both take extreme positions on a given topic. In combination these two opposed views are designed to provide a more complete perspective of the issue. To read a different perspective on this topic, click here.

Let me get this right out into the open…it seems to me simply insane for a small company buy a PBX. Buying a PBX takes precious capital for something that is often not a strategic asset in the life of the business. It’s at best “a necessary evil.”

We’re a small business, around sixty staff in total. Most of them live out their days in our corporate HQ in Cambridge, UK. But the “we” that I’m describing here is actually the dozen of us who earn our keep in the North American operation.

In the UK they enjoy the services of a rather traditional Alcatel PBX. While only six years old, it’s a digital dinosaur. Proprietary. Aged. Limited. Expensive.

The US operation is a very different operation. We’re everywhere, which is to say that we’re not all neatly in cubicles at a single location. We have small offices on each coast, and a handful of home offices. All are inter-connected using a hosted IP-PBX service.

As opposed to spending thousands on a PBX for our largest office we spent a very modest sum acquiring SIP handsets for everyone. Beyond this we pay only for the services that we use on an ongoing basis.

Our hosted PBX meant no CPE except the phones themselves, so our CAPEX was effectively zero. Our Opex is actually less than we had been paying to an executive suites office building to rent a portion of their elderly PBX.

In fact, the cost of the initial rollout was so low that we undertook the project clandestinely. By the time HQ noticed it was all up and running, proving it’s worth by saving us money and helping us to communicate better.

soundpoint ip 450 96x96 Point CounterPoint: Hosted Voice vs. CPEWith none of the traditional issues of vendor lock-in, we opted for good quality SIP phones, focusing on a high-quality user experience. We also provide soft phones and SIP/DECT cordless phones where users require mobility solutions.

Cheap phones are a truly strange form of torture to inflict upon your staff. So is leaving them bound to their desks.

PBX hardware is itself a curious thing and suffers from raging featuritis. I can recall a list of PBX features that was literally thousands of items long. That’s an absurdity. Faced with such complexity small companies often must rely upon a reseller or VAR and hope against hope that they take the time to understand your operation.

There’s little merit to a dazzling list of features if they cannot be accessed to impact the operation of our business.

Small businesses typically need only the simplest of core capabilities from a PBX. This is something that hosted PBX service providers know all too well. They build their service offerings to suit their target market. The KISS principle plays a big role here.

Our chosen provider offers the features that we really need, like four digit dialing between extensions/sites, VM, IVR menus and on demand conferencing. They even offer private IM and presence indication. All these services are integrated into easy to use web-based administration & user portals.

As our provider continues to evolve their service offering we reap the benefits. For example, we now have very high-quality HDVoice (G.722) calling between offices, and even on our conference bridge. Again, no capex incurred. Sweet!

There are different sorts of hosted PBX services. Some bundle their service with hardware and even connectivity to deliver a one-vendor solution where all aspects of the service is under their control.

Other providers may take a more open approach, providing the service and hardware but letting you procure your own bandwidth to each location. Still others let you “Bring Your Own” hardware and bandwidth, providing only the service as their part of the solutions.

We settled upon such a BYO provider as the best match for both our needs and budget. They didn’t want to sell us hardware or nor trunks…just the core telephony service. This suits us fine since we are a few people at multiple locations, using various different types of network connectivity.

We save money in many ways. In the past we’ve paid hundreds of dollars for two weeks of analog phone service in a trade show booth at the Las Vegas convention center. Now we just add a SIP phone on the local internet connection. In fact, it doesn’t matter if the convention is in Las Vegas, Toronto, Santiago or Mexico City.

We also have the flexibility to instantly scale our installation up or down. In effect, adding or removing phones & DIDs we’re constantly “right-sizing” our telecom solution fit the economics of the moment. We pay only for what we use every month, with no long term commitments.

With offices in California, Houston & Miami we’ve suffered many natural disasters. Our hosted PBX provides enhanced business continuity. If California slides into the ocean* a traditional PBX in our Burbank office would simply die under water. Our hosted service allows us to easily set up shop anywhere we have a decent broadband connection.

Further, if we had one centrally located PBX I’d need to worry about having redundant trunk lines from different carriers. Using a hosted service that becomes their worry. It’s an area that needs to be considered when auditioning providers.

In implementing a hosted PBX the issues that you must handle directly are a little more mundane, yet still important. Does your chosen service provider support E911? Do you require/have a strategy for dealing with loss of IP connectivity at each location?

Do you provide a UPS for core network components, including POE to power phones? We do, even in home offices. It’s inexpensive and makes a lot of sense.

There was a time when the sight of a PBX in a local wiring closet meant I was in control of my own destiny. Now it’s just a burden that I don’t need. Our ITSP is a partner in the operation of our business. As we grow, they grow. As we succeed, they succeed.

A PBX is a budget-busting, power-sucking, noise & heat-spewing headache that I simply don’t need.

Disclaimer: the authors are intentionally taking extreme positions for the benefit of the series. Their personal opinions may not mirror the opinions expressed here.

*as foretold in song, with acknowledgment and apologies to the late, great Warren Zevon

Categories
VoIP
Tags
counterpoint, CPE, Dave Michels, hosted pbx, ip pbx, sip, VoIP
Comments rss
Comments rss
Trackback
Trackback

« Point-Counterpoint: An Introduction Android In Desktop Phones From MSI »

8 Responses to “Point-CounterPoint: Hosted Voice vs. CPE”

  1. Peter Radizeski says:
    March 8, 2010 at 1:12 pm

    I agree with much of your analysis. (I even blogged my response). Mobile work force and The Cloud are pushing everything away from premise based. In addition, will every SMB have the skilled tech people on-site to handle the myriad of tasks required today? Telecom, WAN, LAN, desktop, PBX, mobile, security, etc.

    Reply
    • mjgraves says:
      March 8, 2010 at 2:48 pm

      Thanks for leaving the comment. I would like to differentiate between “hosted” and “cloud.” These are not the same thing. While some are implementing cloud based hosted voip, I know that some people regard this as avante garde at the moment. Perhaps even bleeding edge.

      Reply
  2. OnSIP says:
    March 8, 2010 at 2:14 pm

    Great points -

    Like how you addressed common business needs about scalability, cost, vendor-lockin and specific business needs, including features, mobility, and sustainability in case of a natural disaster. Perhaps most exciting is the open possibilities of features for your partner ITSP to develop in the coming months/years… With customer input, of course!

    Keep us updated on the Point-Counter-Point series. — OnSIP

    Reply
  3. Greg says:
    March 8, 2010 at 6:20 pm

    Maybe a good topic for your blog. Discuss the differences between hosted and cloud… honestly, I am not seeing the difference.

    Reply
    • mjgraves says:
      March 8, 2010 at 8:47 pm

      In my mind hosted implies only that you don’t have the switch on your property, but it may be a very traditional switch under management by the service provider. Cloud implies something about the hardware architecture, most typically something based upon virtualization. I know that some people like http://www.rf.com and Ronald Lewis are doing voip or Asterisk in the cloud (ex Amazon EC2), but it’s a very different thing. Most hosted pbx providers are not yet cloud-based.

      Reply
  4. Neal Gilbert says:
    March 9, 2010 at 1:39 pm

    One of the key points made in this article was the following statement

    “In the UK they enjoy the services of a rather traditional Alcatel PBX. While only six years old, it’s a digital dinosaur. Proprietary. Aged. Limited. Expensive.”

    With the pace of technology moving so rapidly, premise based solutions are at a real disadvantage, as evidenced by the author calling his 6-year old system a “digital dinosaur”.

    A Hosted VoIP system provides some measure of “future proofing” because the customer benefits every time the provider rolls out a system/feature upgrade, this is not the case with a premise based system.

    Premise based solutions make sense for much larger organizations that require a high degree of customization and integration with other system within the organization. In addition, as the size of the organization increases the financial benefits of a premise based solution turn favorable.

    Reply
    • mjgraves says:
      March 9, 2010 at 2:55 pm

      Sure, scale is a major issue in determining what makes the most sense for any one installation. Scale and dispersal of staff across geography. Given the fact that all of our UK staff are located at HQ it may still make sense to replace the Alcatel PBX with a more modern on-premises PBX. At least that would permit standards based interop with the hosted installation in North America.

      Heck, we could drop a small Asterisk box at HQ with a PRI card and cross-connect the old beast to the modern world of IP & SIP.

      Reply
  5. Neal Gilbert says:
    March 9, 2010 at 8:45 pm

    I really like the format of this discussion, great job.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Recent Comments

  • CC on Gigaset SIP/DECT Handsets For 2010: Part 3 – C59H
  • mjgraves on Review: Plantronics Savi Go Bluetooth Headset
  • Heather on Review: Plantronics Savi Go Bluetooth Headset
  • mjgraves on Gigaset SIP/DECT Handsets For 2010: Part 3 – C59H
  • CC on Gigaset SIP/DECT Handsets For 2010: Part 3 – C59H

Making Use Of HDVoice Right Now!

  • Series Introduction
  • HDVoice Using Skype
  • HDVoice Using Gizmo5
  • HDVoice Using SIPGate
  • HDVoice Using OnSIP
  • HDVoice Using IdeaSIP
  • HDVoice Using SIP Sorcery

Making A Difference


Change a life.

VoIP Users Conference

Tags

3G apple Asterisk Astlinux Audio Broadband CATiq cell cellular codec conference cordless DECT digium DSL FWD G.722 gateway Gigaset gsm HD hdvoice headset hp M3 music onsip phone polycom QoS router siemens sip skype SNOM soft phone sprint Squeezebox technology USB Video VoIP VUC wideband wifi

RSS mgraves' shared items in Google Reader

  • World's Fastest Hybrid OK'd For Production
  • AT&T Churn Rate Insanely Low
  • Prepaid, 4G returns Sprint to customer growth
  • 2010 Travel
  • By The Numbers: Chevy Volt vs Nissan Leaf
  • Requiem for the G1
  • It's Here! The FreeSWITCH Book Has Been Published!
  • Asterisk v1.8
  • MIPS Technologies Delivers Reference Implementation for Skype on MIPS-Based™ Devices
  • Jailbreaking and Ripping DVDs Now Legal in One Fell Swoop!

Archives

  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries RSS
  • Comments RSS
  • WordPress.org
rss Comments rss valid xhtml 1.1 design by jide powered by Wordpress get firefox