<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gigaset US Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mgraves.org/2009/06/gigaset-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mgraves.org/2009/06/gigaset-update/</link>
	<description>End User Perspective On SOHO Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 12:35:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mjgraves</title>
		<link>http://www.mgraves.org/2009/06/gigaset-update/#comment-926</link>
		<dc:creator>mjgraves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mgraves.org/?p=4454#comment-926</guid>
		<description>Will,

Yes, the phones are physically taller, more like traditional cordless phones. That they can go a decent job of G.722 means that they are very good at G.711.

Michael</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will,</p>
<p>Yes, the phones are physically taller, more like traditional cordless phones. That they can go a decent job of G.722 means that they are very good at G.711.</p>
<p>Michael</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Collins</title>
		<link>http://www.mgraves.org/2009/06/gigaset-update/#comment-925</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mgraves.org/?p=4454#comment-925</guid>
		<description>Are the Gigaset phones longer and more &quot;cordless phone like&quot; than say the M3 phones?  I keep having people complain that the M3 is too short just like cell phones.  And how is the voice quality (G.711 since I know you will point out the G.722 capability) compared to the M3?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are the Gigaset phones longer and more &#8220;cordless phone like&#8221; than say the M3 phones?  I keep having people complain that the M3 is too short just like cell phones.  And how is the voice quality (G.711 since I know you will point out the G.722 capability) compared to the M3?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mjgraves</title>
		<link>http://www.mgraves.org/2009/06/gigaset-update/#comment-924</link>
		<dc:creator>mjgraves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mgraves.org/?p=4454#comment-924</guid>
		<description>Too true. My mistake. It&#039;s the A580IP.

Also, some might wonder why I single out E4 as a reference vendor. I try to link to those companies who sponsor the VoIP Users Conference in recognition of their support of the community. I encourage others to do so as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too true. My mistake. It&#8217;s the A580IP.</p>
<p>Also, some might wonder why I single out E4 as a reference vendor. I try to link to those companies who sponsor the VoIP Users Conference in recognition of their support of the community. I encourage others to do so as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davy Chan</title>
		<link>http://www.mgraves.org/2009/06/gigaset-update/#comment-923</link>
		<dc:creator>Davy Chan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mgraves.org/?p=4454#comment-923</guid>
		<description>Your Tags list S580IP. Don&#039;t you mean A580IP, or is the A580IP being renamed to S580IP for the US market?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your Tags list S580IP. Don&#8217;t you mean A580IP, or is the A580IP being renamed to S580IP for the US market?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
